Click here to view this email on our web site.









QUESTIONS?
NEED MORE INFORMATION?

Contact one of the Tronconi
Segarra & Associates’ State
& Local Tax Services Team
Leaders:

David E. Werth
J.D., CPA, Partner


Andrew J. Toth
CPA, Principal


Thomas E. Mazurek, Jr.
CPA, Senior Manager



State and Local
Tax Services

Audit Representation
Reverse Audits
Nexus Review
Voluntary Disclosure
Research & Analysis
Managed Compliance Agreements
Sales Tax System Development
Outsourcing
Merger & Acquisition Planning
Compliance Management

Tax Tips – October 2011


Have a question about state and local taxes? Struggling with a sales & use tax issue? Help is just a click away! Send an email to the Tronconi Segarra & Associates state and local tax team. They will answer your question personally, and then publish questions (anonymously) with their answers in a future newsletter issue. Click here to email your question to Tronconi Segarra & Associates.



State Amnesty Programs At-a-Glance

State Amnesty Period Benefits
Colorado Oct. 1 to Nov. 15, 2011 ½ Interest & Penalties waived
Ohio May 1 to June 15, 2012 ½ Interest & Penalties waived


Where “Inaction” Equals Denial of a Refund

NM

Where does a state’s inaction on a refund claim result in an effective “denial” of the claim? New Mexico, that’s where. The Taxpayer filed a timely claim for refund on October 8, 2009. On May 19, 2010, the Department sent the Taxpayer a letter (210-day letter) indicating that the Department could not take any action on the claim because more than 210 days (actually about 220 days) had passed since the claim was filed.

The letter also advised that the claim could be refiled provided that the statute of limitations had not expired. A state representative told the Taxpayer that the statute of limitations would not apply because the claim had originally been filed within the time and was presently being processed.

The Taxpayer refiled the claim on May 19, 2010. However, a New Mexico hearing officer has concluded that, at the time of refiling, the claim had become stale as it was after the December 31, 2009 deadline, and the Department could not act on the claim. In The Matter Of The Protest Of Healthsouth Rehabilitation, To The Denial Of Refund Under Id No. L0402881600, dated September 6, 2011.

Remedies for Inaction by the Department

When a claim for refund is neither granted nor denied within 120 days of the date the claim was filed, taxpayers have the option of refiling the claim or of pursuing a legal or administrative remedy within 90 days of the 120th day, that is within 210 days of the date of the claim. See NMSA 1978, § 7-1-26 (B). Taxpayers may only refile the claim if there is still time to do so under the statute of limitations. See NMSA 1978, § 7-1-26 (B) and (D). Taxpayers must file an administrative protest or a lawsuit in district court within 210 days of the date that the claim was filed. See NMSA 1978, § 7-1-26 (B) and (C).

So If you’ve filed a refund claim in New Mexico (or are about to), you may consider refilling the claim on the 121st day of the original filing whether you’ve heard from The Taxation and Revenue Department or not. If you wait until the Department sends an inaction letter, it may be too late to refile the claim.

Estoppel

The Taxpayer argued that it was relying on statements made by the state’s representative when the 210-day letter was sent and that the statute of limitations should not apply. To the extent that the Taxpayer's argument might encompass equitable estoppel, the hearing officer overruled it, noting that equitable estoppel is an exclusively judicial remedy. See AA Oilfield Service v. New Mexico State Corp. Comm'n, 118 N.M. 273, 881 P.2d 18 (1994) (holding that an administrative agency cannot grant the equitable remedy of estoppel because that power is held exclusively by the judiciary). Right argument . . . wrong forum. Perhaps the Taxpayer will seek a judicial remedy after all.



Main Office Phone: 716.633.1373
Office Locations | Refer a Business Associate


Thank you for your interest in the Tronconi Segarra & Associates LLP State & Local Tax electronic newsletter. This message was sent from Barbara Harmel at Tronconi Segarra & Associates LLP, 6390 Main Street, Suite 200, Williamsville, New York, 14221.

To unsubscribe from future State & Local Tax newsletters sent by Tronconi Segarra & Associates, please reply to this email and type "Unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Any tax advice included in this written or electronic communication was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, by the recipient for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under the Internal Revenue Code or any other governmental taxing authority or agency.

The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of, distribution of, copying of or taking action in reliance on this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify the sender immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer